APOLOGY FOR FILING AN OBVIOUSLY BASELESS LAWSUIT

Apr 19, 2023

Competitive struggle between entrepreneurs should take place in the market. Worse if it moves to the courtroom, because it usually means violating the rights or interests of one of the entities. Even worse, however, if one of the entrepreneurs sues the other making it a form of intimidation, harassment or chicanery. In one of the cases handled by our law firm, just such a situation occurred. A lawsuit was brought against our client, alleging acts of unfair competition – the marketing of goods intended to be slavish copies of the plaintiff’s products. The problem was that these acts did not take place, which, according to our client, the plaintiff was well aware of.

OBVIOUSLY UNFOUNDED ACTION

We succeeded in obtaining a judgment dismissing the claim in the case, moreover, we requested an apology for bringing the action. Such a possibility is provided by Article 22(1) of the Law on Combating Unfair Competition.  According to it: If a manifestly unfounded unfair competition lawsuit is brought, the court, at the request of the defendant, may order the plaintiff to make one or more statements of appropriate content and form.

APOLOGY FOR OBVIOUSLY BASELESS ACTION

The court agreed with our argument, pointing out that no one had ever seen the product allegedly marketed by the plaintiff. It also rightly noted that in the case it was obvious that the plaintiff had other reasons for bringing the suit, but these the court did not determine.

Thus, the plaintiff not only lost the case and was ordered to pay costs, but was obliged to publish an apology on its website in favor of our client. The verdict is not final, but it is a warning to entrepreneurs against too hasty filing of lawsuits regardless of their reasons. 

Judgment of the SO in Gdansk dated 14.04.2023. Case file XVII GW 63/22 (not final).

Art. 22 unfair competition act – landmark case

Unfair competition law – landmark case

Slavish imitation

Slavish imitation is one of key issues regulated by the unfair competition act.

Overall impression – design features

When ascertaining design infringement the key thing is to compare the features of the design.

NEWAG – PLANNED OBOSCOLENCE?

Did NEWAG really corrupted the source code of the trains provided to his clients? What is his potential liability?

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY DESIGN FOR CLOTHING INDUSTRY

What is an industrial property design and how to use it to benefit your company?

SEO WITH SOMEONE ELSE’S TRADEMARK

What Your marketing campaign should not look like? Definitely don’t use someone else’s trademark. We explain why in uour newest article.

FAILURE TO GIVE A DISCOUNT AN ACT OF UNFAIR COMPETITION?

If a businessman does not give me the same discount as another contractor, does he violate my rights by doing so? Can such an action be understood in terms of an act of unfair competition?

CLOSING OF THE BREWERY IN LEŻAJSK – WHAT EFFECT DOES THIS HAVE ON THE TRADEMARK?

What is going to happen with Your trademark if you change Your headquaters?

HOW TO PROVE TRADEMARK RIGHTS IN COURT

How to prove that You have a right to a trademark? This is a primary difficulty when enforcing intellectual property rights.

PACZKOMAT TRADEMARK DISPUTE

Was InPost right about his Paczkomat trademark? Is it really descriptive and is going to be cancelled? What are the other options of competitors?

CALL US

+48 (58) 716 71 68

WRITE US